A Lufthansa 787's nose gear collapsed at the gate — and a commenter named the likely culprit

A Lufthansa Boeing 787 suffered a front-wheel collapse while parked at a Frankfurt gate, injuring several. The thread surfaced a near-identical British Airways incident and a mundane, unsettling cause: a maintenance pin in the wrong one of two near-identical holes.

What happened

A Lufthansa Boeing 787-9 suffered a nose-gear (front wheel) collapse while parked at a gate at Frankfurt Airport, with several people reported injured. The detail that made the thread uneasy is the setting: not a hard landing, not a taxiing accident, but a wide-body airliner whose front gear failed while it was standing still.

"So a plane which has withstood probably countless landings, had its nose gear collapse while sitting statically at a gate of all times and places? Weird." — a commenter on the strange timing

The thread finds the precedent

This is where Hacker News earns its keep. A former hardware reviewer recalled that British Airways had a very similar 787 nose-gear event years ago, and named a disconcertingly mundane cause:

"A misplaced security pin that was inserted in the wrong place during a maintenance operation. There are two very similar holes next to one another that can receive the pin." — a former hardware reviewer recalling the BA case

If the same human-factors trap is in play here, the story isn't a structural failure of the aircraft — it's two near-identical holes and a maintenance step where the wrong choice looks exactly like the right one. A reader posted contemporaneous video of the aftermath from an aviation-maintenance community.

Watch the aftermath video (Reddit)

The boring causes are the scary ones

Aviation safety folklore is full of catastrophes that trace back to something tiny and procedural — a pin, a piece of tape, a checklist item read too fast. If the Frankfurt collapse follows the British Airways pattern, it's a reminder that the most robust machine ever mass-produced is still gated by a technician choosing the correct hole at 4 a.m. The official investigation will take months; the thread's hypothesis took minutes, and it points at the maintenance manual, not the airframe.

Get breakdowns like this every day

The top Hacker News stories, unpacked — by email, Telegram, or RSS.

Next story · 6 of 23 Read more
🌍Other

Nearly 60% of the time, UK media quoted 'defence experts' without saying who pays them

An Action on Armed Violence study found that in almost 60% of cases, UK outlets presented military commentators without disclosing their arms-industry or defence-sector ties. The thread fought over where genuine expertise ends and undisclosed conflict of interest begins.

★ 365 · 💬 199 · aoav.org.uk · 3 min