Apple renamed its assistant 'Siri AI,' and the keynote room audibly groaned

A developer watching the keynote on a big screen described everyone collectively sighing when the name dropped. The thread's split: keeping the Siri brand on a clean-sheet assistant is either smart equity or a millstone — and 'coming this fall' is doing a lot of work.

In brief

The Passwords app can now update weak credentials on your behalf, and Siri can finally drive Shortcuts and reach across apps. But the on-device features demand 12GB of memory and an iPhone 17, and most of it ships 'this fall.'

The substantive optimism is about plumbing, not the chat box: cross-app primitives that might make Siri functional for the first time. The pessimism is two years of unshipped promises and a name people associate with bad software.

"Siri AI" — the name landed with a collective sigh in the keynote room

Apple Intelligence — Siri AI
Apple Intelligence — Siri AI

Apple's Apple Intelligence page — the marketing home for the rebranded "Siri AI" — drew 491 points and 426 comments. The thread is a referendum on whether keeping the Siri name on a clean-sheet assistant is a smart use of brand equity or a millstone, and on whether "coming this fall" means anything after the last two years.

What the page actually promises

The landing page positions Siri AI as a system-wide assistant: cross-app actions, on-device and Private Cloud Compute processing, image and writing tools, improved dictation, and consumer-facing conveniences like a Passwords app that flags weak or compromised credentials and "can update them on your behalf." Apple leans on a human-focused framing and takes visible shade at rival AI implementations. The fine print does the damage: the on-device features require an iPhone 17 Pro / Pro Max / Air, iPads with M4+, or Macs with M3+, each with at least 12GB of unified memory — and most of it ships "this fall."

Apple Intelligence feature hero
Apple Intelligence feature hero

The branding fight: keep "Siri" or bury it?

The room's reaction told the story. A Montreal developer watching the keynote on an office big screen described the moment the name dropped:

"Everyone collectively sigh[ed] when they announced the name … if you want it to feel like a watershed moment where old Siri is 'behind us' finally, just give it a new name." — a developer who watched the keynote with colleagues

"I hear Siri, I subconsciously associate it with really bad software." — a commenter on Siri's brand baggage

The counterpoint was Apple's own turnaround history:

"Hey if they could turn Apple Maps around, why not Siri?" — a commenter invoking the Maps recovery

"For real this time" — the credibility tax

The recurring jab was the timeline. "Coming this fall" set off the muscle memory of two years of unshipped promises:

"> coming this fall — I believe we also heard that a couple years ago." — a commenter on the recurring 'this fall'

One commenter mourned the old launch cadence: "I miss the days when Steve Jobs used to say 'and it's available right now, you can demo it in the hall outside.'" The thread did note the demos were filmed on real devices in real hands this time — a small hedge against the vaporware reflex.

Where the optimists actually point: cross-app primitives

The most substantive defense isn't about the chat box, it's about plumbing. Siri AI gets the ability to drive Shortcuts and tap into app actions — the thing that would finally make it functional:

"The most notable thing here is that they finally have the primitives to make Siri actually useful across apps. I can't even use Siri to close Google Maps in my car right now." — a commenter on the cross-app primitives

"The advent of Siri being able to tap into shortcut actions — and script them — might make it feel more worthwhile to app devs to open up deep functions." — a commenter comparing it to how MCP pushed SaaS vendors to ship clean APIs

Even that optimism came with a live bug report: one user tried to make a shortcut to toggle an accessibility setting and got "Try describing something different" — the old failure mode, still present.

The squint: a working assistant Apple is ashamed to rename

The honest read is split down the middle. Underneath, this is the Gemini-co-developed architecture — a credible model wired into the OS with real cross-app reach, which is more than Siri has ever had. On top, it's wrapped in a name the keynote audience audibly groaned at, gated behind a device list that excludes phones sold on the original AI promise, and dated "this fall" by a company that has spent that currency. If the cross-app primitives ship and work, the groan ages badly. If "this fall" slips again, the name will be the least of it.

Get breakdowns like this every day

The top Hacker News stories, unpacked — by email, Telegram, or RSS.

Next story · 24 of 28 Read more
🚀Tech

Apple's new Siri foundation models were co-developed with Google's Gemini

Apple says its rebuilt Apple Intelligence runs on foundation models co-developed with Google using Gemini, with user data sealed inside Private Cloud Compute. The thread's read: Google sold Apple the right to run Gemini on Apple's own hardware, like the original iPhone running Google Maps.

★ 451 · 💬 367 · macrumors.com · 6 min