A page mocking AI skeptics for 'moving the goalposts' is itself AI-generated — and lies that its quotes are real
The timeline catalogs four years of critics shifting the bar every time AI clears it. It's sharp, it's smug, and it's plainly machine-written — right down to a line claiming its own quotes are 'real and checkable.' A reader who checked says they aren't.
The satire tracks 2022–2026: each skeptic goalpost — Turing test, Snake game, one-person unicorn — lasts about 18 months before it falls, set against booster claims like Google's 'quarter of new code is AI' and a founder's $1M ARR in 17 days.
The thread's flip is that the page mocking skeptics is itself AI slop that fabricates its own evidence, and that the real grievance was never capability — it's how executives treated workers on the way.
The bit, and the tell
*It Still Can't Do My Job: Four Years of Moving Goalposts* is a satirical 2022–2026 timeline of AI skepticism, arguing each objection holds for roughly 18 months before capability makes it obsolete: the Turing test, then a working Snake game, then a one-person unicorn. It juxtaposes those retreating goalposts against booster milestones — Google's Sundar Pichai saying "more than a quarter of all new code" is AI-generated (Oct 2024), Pieter Levels claiming $1M ARR in 17 days, Jensen Huang declaring "everybody in the world is now a programmer" — and needles the skeptic refrain, "Call me when it stops making things up." It also cites a July 2025 METR study finding developers were 19% slower with AI while believing they were 20% faster.
The catch: the page is visibly AI-generated, and that becomes the whole thread.
The satire eats itself
Commenters caught the page making a claim about itself it couldn't back:
"The thing that annoys me most about this obviously AI-generated article is: 'The quotes in orange boxes are real and checkable.' No they aren't - you AI generated them, just like you generated the rest of the page." — a commenter who writes about tech and checked the quotes
Another mimicked the page's own staccato AI cadence to mock it — "Call me. When the AI stops writing. Every blog post. Like this." But the sharpest reframe rejected the entire "goalpost" premise:
"I don't know anyone in the tech industry who thinks AGI will never happen… The frustration is with how much the claims have outpaced reality and how poorly the investors and executives have treated their workers during this transition." — a commenter relocating the grievance from capability to conduct
And from someone building with the tools, a number to set against the hype:
"A good game typically takes around 3-8 years of development by multiple skilled people… Right now single prompt… can get us a small protype of like 1 game mechanic that's not even remotely production ready." — a commenter working in game prototyping
The self-own is the story: a piece written to prove skeptics keep lying about AI's limits turns out to fabricate its own evidence — which is, precisely, the thing skeptics keep pointing at.
Get breakdowns like this every day
The top Hacker News stories, unpacked — by email, Telegram, or RSS.
Valve 'open-sourced' the Steam Machine's e-ink screen. It turns out to be an off-the-shelf Adafruit part
The headline invites you to build your own e-ink faceplate for Valve's new console. Then a commenter identifies the mystery display: a stock Adafruit 5.83-inch panel you can order today — and Valve has said it won't make one of its own.