A record 242 US cities now have starter homes that cost $1M
A starter home is the bottom third of a market. In 242 cities, that bottom third now clears a million dollars. New Jersey had one such city in 2020; it has 26 today.
California holds 105 of these cities, New York 41, New Jersey 26. The national typical starter home is still $198,649, so the gap between the headline and the median is the whole story.
A founder who sold his company for eight figures wrote that he can barely afford a condo in Jersey City, and that the homes around him are not even selling. Others doubted the count, noting Zillow never publishes the actual city names.
What "$1M starter home" actually counts
Zillow's report hangs on one definition: a starter home is a home in the lowest third of values in a region. The count of cities where that lowest third clears $1 million has nearly tripled since the pandemic — from 80 in February 2020 to 242 in April 2026, up 16 in the past year. For contrast, the typical starter home nationwide costs $198,649, up 1.7% year over year.
The concentration is coastal but spreading. California has the most cities; New York and New Jersey together added 15 in a single year, and 26 states now have at least one.
| State | $1M starter-home cities | Pre-pandemic (2020) |
|---|---|---|
| California | 105 | — |
| New York | 41 | 12 |
| New Jersey | 26 | 1 |
By metro, the New York City area leads with 63 such cities, ahead of San Francisco (37), Los Angeles (33), San Jose (13), and Miami and Seattle (8 each).
"The top house of the bottom third"
The thread's first job was decoding the stat. One read stripped it to mechanics:
"Apparently this means that the top house of the bottom 1/3rd is now $1m in 242 cities." — a long-tenured commenter
Another reached for the inflation calculator before reacting to the number:
"Remember $1M today is the same as $750K in January 2019." — a commenter linking the BLS calculator
The buyer who "made it" and still can't buy
The most concrete voice came from someone the headline supposedly describes as a winner:
"I sold my company ~2 years ago for a very decent 8-figure exit… Currently barely affording a condo in Jersey City (not Manhattan)… none of these homes are selling, the ones that sell are vacant EB-1 investments" — a founder describing his own house hunt
Doubt about the data — and the sales pitch underneath
The loudest counter-thread questioned the methodology and the motive. One high-karma commenter flatly disbelieved a line item:
"There's no city in Georgia where a starter home is $1 million. This methodology has to be highly flawed." — a commenter calling out a specific state figure
A Texas resident chased the data and came up empty, then pointed at who benefits from the panic:
"They don't define what constitutes a city and seem to be purposely… hiding the data… This is just fear driven advertising. BUY NOW OR YOU'LL NEVER OWN A HOME!!" — a reader who traced the source links for the city list
That is the squint to keep: the publisher of the scary number, Zillow, also sells home loans, rentals, and a credit-building product in the same press release. The headline is real arithmetic on a curated definition — and the company doing the arithmetic profits when readers conclude they must buy now.
Get breakdowns like this every day
The top Hacker News stories, unpacked — by email, Telegram, or RSS.
The Nobel scientist behind AlphaFold leaves DeepMind for Anthropic
John Jumper shared a 2024 Chemistry Nobel for cracking protein folding with AlphaFold. Nine years at DeepMind, and now he is walking across the street to a rival lab that just bought a biotech startup.