Norway tells schools: no AI for kids under 13, cautious use only after 14
Grades one through seven — ages 6 to 13 — should as a rule not use AI at all. Teens 14 to 16 may adopt tools cautiously, under teacher supervision. It follows Norway's 2024 smartphone ban.
The rule splits cleanly by age and arrives after Norway pulled phones from classrooms in 2024 amid falling test scores.
Simon Willison endorsed it: kids under 13 need to learn to read, write and comprehend, and generative AI won't help with that. The thread's bleakest description of the status quo: education has become an 'AI echo chamber' — teachers use AI to write assignments, students use AI to do them, teachers use AI to grade them, principals use AI to watch the teachers.
A ban drawn by age, not by tool
Norway's government has set a near-ban on AI in elementary school, Reuters reports. The rule, as quoted in the thread: pupils from first through seventh grade, aged 6 to 13, should as a general rule not be using AI, while those in lower secondary school, aged 14 to 16, can cautiously adopt tools under teachers' supervision.
It doesn't arrive in isolation. Facing a broad decline in test scores, Norway in 2024 banned smartphones from schools and handed teachers back more authority to enforce classroom discipline. The AI rule extends that posture. One reader noted an apparent tension: Norway also runs Sikt AI for schools, where teachers monitor how AI is used — so the country is both embracing and restricting it depending on the grade.
Willison: under-13s need to learn to read and write first
The most-upvoted take came from a well-known developer, and it tracked the policy's logic:
"Kids under 13 need to learn to read, write and comprehend text. Generative AI is not going to help them with those skills. They can play with AI at home, and after 13 they can learn how to use AI productively." — Simon Willison
A second voice sharpened why this case differs from past tech panics:
"You don't hand out calculators before kids understand arithmetic. LLM version is sneakier because skipping the work still produces something that looks finished." — a commenter on why the output hides the skipped learning
The calculator parallel — and the people who lived it
Not everyone bought the ban. Readers reached for history: bans on calculators, on computers, on internet search in the 1990s, all of which curdled into curricula rather than prohibitions.
"I already saw it in my life: a ban on calculators, a ban on computers. But after a short period of rejection, everybody starts to embrace the new tech." — a commenter who lived through earlier classroom-tech bans
The counterweight came from someone pointing at the field's own forums:
"Spend a few minutes on the teacher subreddits… AI has been a disaster for student outcomes and educator performance, more or less across the board. It should be banned in education, but there's no way to enforce that without increasing educator workload substantially." — a commenter citing /r/teachers and /r/professors
The system eating its own tail
The thread's most quotable diagnosis wasn't about kids at all — it was about the whole apparatus closing the loop:
"Education right now has basically become a giant AI echo chamber… teachers use AI to make assignments, students use AI to do them, teachers use AI to grade them, and principals use AI to watch over the teachers." — a commenter describing the closed loop
Another parent flagged the half the policy ignores: nothing in the rule addresses teachers using AI to generate sub-par worksheets or to mark work inaccurately. Norway drew its line at the student under 13. The harder question the thread kept circling — who polices the adults on the other side of the desk — the policy leaves open.
Get breakdowns like this every day
The top Hacker News stories, unpacked — by email, Telegram, or RSS.
A firm blew its 2026 AI budget by April, then capped staff at $1,500/month
The company set its AI budget in 2025, before coding agents got hungry. By April the money was gone, and engineers got a hard monthly token ceiling.