A manifesto says open AI must win. The thread can't agree on what 'open' means (opensourceaimustwin.com)
The manifesto's pitch: if intelligence becomes something you can only rent from a few closed institutions, you lose operational freedom, not just software freedom. It wants the freedom to study, repair, audit, and run models yourself.
The thread's puzzle: a model you can't run on your own computer isn't open by the classic definition, and nobody can say who funds open frontier training when a single run costs a fortune.
Sign in to save