Tag

Online Safety Act

5 stories

Ofcom's CEO told MPs the UK may never collect its 4chan fine (prestonbyrne.com)

Dame Melanie Dawes told a Commons committee Ofcom would have to "accept that we won't be able to recover that money" if foreign courts block enforcement. The source is 4chan's own lawyer, so read it as an advocate's account.

A thread commenter adds the footnote: 4chan lost its suit on sovereign immunity, and the court's remarks were obiter dicta.

🌍Other ★ 333 · 💬 254 · 7 days ago · #policy#privacy#4chan#Ofcom#Online Safety Act

Not just a headline — the discussion unpacked

The top HN threads: facts from the discussions, both sides, insider voices. Email, Telegram, or RSS.

Age checks aren't about kids, the essay argues — they're a switch for attributing speech (nonogra.ph)

The essay reframes 'protect the children' as plumbing for prosecution: law enforcement needs what-happened plus who-did-it, and identity-bound accounts automate the second half. Its advice is sparse — refuse to verify; if forced, pay an age service in Monero.

The harshest pushback was tactical, not ideological. A high-karma engineer called the crypto answer an unscalable dodge: the only fix is calling your representatives, and 'the only group competent enough to oppose identity verification has its head in the sand.'

A Discord breach leaked 68,000 Australian IDs weeks before the age-verification law hit (expression.fire.org)

A Discord breach exposed government ID images, names and emails for 68,000 Australians just weeks before the country's under-16 social-media ban took effect in December 2025. Then Australia's own research found roughly seven in ten kids still on social media months later.

On the thread, a Google cryptographer argued the privacy loss is avoidable: anonymous credentials can prove you're over 18 without the verifier ever learning who you are, or correlating your visits. The counter from another corner: identifying yourself online is long overdue.

🌍Other ★ 457 · 💬 219 · Jun 26 · #policy#privacy#security#Discord#FIRE#Jeremy Kun+2

The UK age-gated social media, kids switched to VPNs, so now the government is eyeing VPNs (birminghammail.co.uk)

Having age-gated social media through the Online Safety Act, ministers are now studying VPNs as the next enforcement gap. The article carrying the story turned out to be a clickbait aggregation a reader debunked on the spot.

A security researcher's counter cut deeper than the tech: the Great Firewall of China is technically beatable and has still achieved exactly what it set out to do.

The UK wants under-16s off social media. Every engineer in the thread asks the same thing: how (manchestereveningnews.co.uk)

Britain is moving toward an age threshold of 16 for social media, built on the Online Safety Act that already lets Ofcom fine platforms. Australia switched on its own under-16 ban in December 2025, so the UK has a live precedent to copy.

The catch is mechanical: 'highly effective age assurance' means face-scan estimation or photo-ID at sign-up. As one games-industry engineer put it, the IDs don't go to the government, they go to verification vendors like Persona and Yoti, who then confirm to Meta and ByteDance exactly who you are.