Debian’s proposed LLM ban exposes a harder question: what counts as assistance? (lists.debian.org)
The proposal argues that uncertain licensing, error-prone output, reviewer burden, and scraping-driven infrastructure costs conflict with Debian’s stability and community values. It excludes upstream projects using LLMs, but would cover Debian’s own software, web resources, documentation, and translations.
HN’s most useful response was practical: instead of asking whether a tool was involved, ask what a maintainer is personally prepared to certify and support.